See Also
USA v. Gonzalez-Navarette (4:24-cr-02347), Arizona District CourtUSA v. Rodriguez-Gomez (4:24-cr-03443), Arizona District CourtUSA v. Ballesteros-Almeraz
| Arizona District Court | |
| Case #: | 4:24-cr-03428 |
| Case Filed: | Jun 10, 2024 |
- Docket
- Parties (2)
| Last checked: Wednesday Jun 12, 2024 12:22 AM MST |
Defendant Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz (1) | Represented By Saul Martin Huerta, Jr. |
Plaintiff USA | Represented By Jose Ruben Solis, Jr. |
Docket last updated: 06/12/2024 1:08 AM MST
| Monday, June 03, 2024 | ||
| Arrest of Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz on 6/3/2024. (LML) [4:24-mj-04644-N/A-JR] Related: [-] | ||
| Tuesday, June 04, 2024 | ||
| 1 | 1 COMPLAINT as to Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz. (LML) [4:24-mj-04644-N/A-JR] Related: [-] | |
| Wednesday, June 05, 2024 | ||
| 3 | 3 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera: Initial Appearance as to Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz held on 6/5/2024. FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT TAKEN. Appointing Saul Martin Huerta, Jr for Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz with Appointment Type: CJA. Defendant(s) state true name to be the same. Government's motion for detention and request for continuance of the Detention Hearing is granted. Defendant(s) temporarily detained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal. Interpreter required for Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz (1) English. In the presence of government and defense counsel, the Court orally advises the government of their Brady obligation. Written order to follow. Appearances : AUSA Vincent Sottosanti, duty for the Government, CJA Attorney Saul Huerta for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Detention Hearing set for 6/7/2024 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins. Preliminary Hearing set for 6/20/2024 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera. Related [+] Hearing held 2:27 PM to 3:05 PM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (CXE) [4:24-mj-04644-N/A-JR] Related: [-] corded by COURTSMART. | |
| 4 | 4 ORDER: Under federal law, including Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and all applicable decisions from the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit interpreting Brady , the government has a continuing obligation to produce all information or evidence known to the government relating to guilt or punishment that might reasonably be considered favorable to the defendant's case, even if the evidence is not admissible so long as it is reasonably likely to lead to admissible evidence. See United States v. Price , 566 F.3d 900,913 n.14 (9th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the court orders the government to produce to the defendant in a timely manner all such information or evidence. Information or evidence may be favorable to a defendant's case if it either may help bolster the defendant's case or impeach a prosecutor's witness or other government evidence. If doubt exists, it should be resolved in favor of the defendant with full disclosure being made. If the government believes that a required disclosure would compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other substantial government interest, the government may apply to the Court for a modification of the requirements of this Disclosure Order, which may include in camera review and/or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of the information. This Disclosure Order is entered under Rule 5(f) and does not relieve any party in this matter of any other discovery obligation. The consequences for violating either this Disclosure Order or the government's obligations under Brady include, but are not limited to, the following: contempt, sanction, referral to a disciplinary authority, adverse jury instruction, exclusion of evidence, and dismissal of charges. Nothing in this Disclosure Order enlarges or diminishes the government's obligation to disclose information and evidence to a defendant under Brady , as interpreted and applied under Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent. As the Supreme Court noted, "the government violates the Constitution's Due Process Clause 'if it withholds evidence that is favorable to the defense and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment." ' Turner v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 1885, 1888 (2017), quoting Smith v. Cain , 565 U.S. 73, 75 (2012). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera.(CXE)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) [4:24-mj-04644-N/A-JR] Related: [-] | |
| 5 | 5 SEALED CJA 23 Financial Affidavit by Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz. (CXE) [4:24-mj-04644-N/A-JR] Related: [-] | |
| Friday, June 07, 2024 | ||
| 6 | 6 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins: Detention Hearing as to Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz held on 6/7/2024. Defense counsel submits on the issue of detention at this time with leave to file a motion upon receiving additional information. Defendant ordered detained pending trial. Preliminary Hearing (possible Plea and Sentence) set on 6/20/2024 at 9:30 AM. Appearances : AUSA Ashley Enderle, attorney on duty for the Government. CJA Attorney Saul Huerta for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Interpreter: N/A. Related [+] Hearing held 11:02 AM to 11:10 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (CAB) [4:24-mj-04644-N/A-JR] Related: [-] corded by COURTSMART. | |
| 7 | 7 ORDER OF DETENTION as to Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins on 6/7/2024.(CAB) [4:24-mj-04644-N/A-JR] Related: [-] | |
| Monday, June 10, 2024 | ||
| 8 | 8 MINUTE ORDER: Due to clerical error, Case was reassigned using the correct process as to Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz. Judge Scott H Rash and Magistrate Judge Michael A Ambri added. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) Related: [-] | |
| 9 | 9 *INFORMATION - Felony as to Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz (1) count(s) 1, 2. (MCO) *Modified to add attachment(s): #1 Information with correct Judge assignment; NEF regenerated on 6/11/2024 (MCO)/(SCH). Related: [-] | |
| 11 | 11 *WAIVER OF INDICTMENT by Jennifer Guadalupe Ballesteros-Almeraz. (MCO) *Modified to add attachment(s): #1 Wavier with correct Judge assignment; NEF regenerated (MCO)/(SCH). Related: [-] | |
| 12 | 12 MINUTE ORDER: Clerical Error - case reassigned to the initial random assignment as a Flip Flop to Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera added as to Jennifer Guadalup Ballesteros-Almeraz. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) *Modified to correct docket text on 6/11/2024 (MCO). Related: [-] | |
Continue to Create Account
