USA v. Gonzalez-Navarette (4:24-cr-02347), Arizona District Court (2024)


USA v. Gonzalez-Navarette

Arizona District Court
Case #: 4:24-cr-02347
Case Filed:May 01, 2024
  • Docket
  • Parties (2)
Last checked: Friday May 31, 2024 1:25 AM MST

Defendant

Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette (1)

Represented By

Patrick Manuel Doyle
Law Office Of Patrick M Doyle PLLC
contact info

Plaintiff

USA

Represented By

Micah Schmit
Us Attorneys Office - Tucson, Az
contact info



Docket last updated: 56 minutes ago

Tuesday, April 02, 2024
Arrest of Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette on 4/2/2024. (BHA) [4:24-mj-08759-N/A-BGM]

Related: [-]

Wednesday, April 03, 2024
1 1 COMPLAINT as to Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette. (BHA) [4:24-mj-08759-N/A-BGM]

Related: [-]

Thursday, April 04, 2024
3 3 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael A Ambri: Initial Appearance as to Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette held on 4/4/2024. Defendant(s) state true name to be the same. Government's motion for detention and request for continuance of the Detention Hearing is granted. Defendant(s) temporarily detained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal. Spanish Interpreter required. An attorney is appointed to represent the defendant. In the presence of government and defense counsel, the Court orally advises the government of their Brady obligation. Written order to follow. Appearances : AUSA Austin Fenwick (duty) for the Government, CJA Attorney Rosemarie Valdez specially appears for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Spanish Interpreter Liliana Nido-Zawacki assists defendant. Detention Hearing set for 4/8/2024 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich. Preliminary Hearing set for 4/8/2024 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich. Related [+] Hearing held 2:27 PM to 3:35 PM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SGG) [4:24-mj-08759-N/A-BGM]

Related: [-] corded by COURTSMART.

4 4 ORDER: Under federal law, including Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and all applicable decisions from the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit interpreting Brady , the government has a continuing obligation to produce all information or evidence known to the government relating to guilt or punishment that might reasonably be considered favorable to the defendant's case, even if the evidence is not admissible so long as it is reasonably likely to lead to admissible evidence. See United States v. Price , 566 F.3d 900,913 n.14 (9th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the court orders the government to produce to the defendant in a timely manner all such information or evidence. Information or evidence may be favorable to a defendant's case if it either may help bolster the defendant's case or impeach a prosecutor's witness or other government evidence. If doubt exists, it should be resolved in favor of the defendant with full disclosure being made. If the government believes that a required disclosure would compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other substantial government interest, the government may apply to the Court for a modification of the requirements of this Disclosure Order, which may include in camera review and/or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of the information. This Disclosure Order is entered under Rule 5(f) and does not relieve any party in this matter of any other discovery obligation. The consequences for violating either this Disclosure Order or the government's obligations under Brady include, but are not limited to, the following: contempt, sanction, referral to a disciplinary authority, adverse jury instruction, exclusion of evidence, and dismissal of charges. Nothing in this Disclosure Order enlarges or diminishes the government's obligation to disclose information and evidence to a defendant under Brady , as interpreted and applied under Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent. As the Supreme Court noted, "the government violates the Constitution's Due Process Clause 'if it withholds evidence that is favorable to the defense and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment." ' Turner v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 1885, 1888 (2017), quoting Smith v. Cain , 565 U.S. 73, 75 (2012). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A Ambri.(SGG)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) [4:24-mj-08759-N/A-BGM]

Related: [-]

5 5 MINUTE ORDER: Added appointed attorney Patrick Manuel Doyle (CJA) for Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ARC) [4:24-mj-08759-N/A-BGM]

Related: [-]

Monday, April 08, 2024
6 6 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich: Detention Hearing as to Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette held on 4/8/2024. Defendant ordered detained pending trial., Preliminary Hearing as to Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette waived on 4/8/2024. Finding: Defendant held to answer before District Court.. Magistrate case referral is Judge Macdonald. Appearances : AUSA Nathaniel Walters (duty) for the Government, CJA Attorney Patrick Doyle for defendant. Defendant is present and in custody. Spanish Interpreter Ignacio Barrientos assists defendant. Related [+] Hearing held 10:56 AM to 10:59 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (CMB) [4:24-mj-08759-N/A-BGM]

Related: [-] corded by COURTSMART.

7 7 ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL as to Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette. I conclude that the following facts require the detention of the defendant pending trial in this case. Findings of Fact and Statement of Reasons: (1) There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense. (2) There is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear. (3) Defendant is a citizen of another country, illegally in the United States of America. (4) Defendant does not have sufficient ties to the community. (5) The reports from Pretrial Services Agency are adopted as the further findings of this Magistrate Judge. Directions Regarding Detention: The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his/her designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich on 4/08/2024. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (CMB) [4:24-mj-08759-N/A-BGM]

Related: [-]

Wednesday, May 01, 2024
8 8 INDICTMENT Related [+] as to Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette (1) count(s) 1. Arraignment set for 5/24/2024 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald. ***NOTICE: Counsel is advised as to ARRAIGNMENT set and the following proposed dates: TRIAL date is 7/02/2024 at 9:30 AM, and PLEA DEADLINE is 6/14/2024. NOTE: The process for waiving defendants appearance at Arraignment has changed. There is no longer a need to file a Notice of Intent to File Waiver of Defendants Appearance. Instead, signed appearance waivers may be electronically filed using the Waiver of Defendants Presence at Arraignment and Acknowledgement of Trial Date event. The event is located under Criminal Event Categories: Other Filings/Waivers. The signed Waiver must be filed no later than 12:00 PM the business day prior to the scheduled arraignment. Failure of defense counsel to file a timely waiver (or a timely motion to continue) may result in the reappointment of defense counsel. (ARC)

Related: [-] dacted for Public Disclosure

9 9 SEALED UNREDACTED INDICTMENT as to Edyn Antonio Gonzalez-Navarette. (ARC)

Related: [-]

Continue to Create Account

USA v. Gonzalez-Navarette (4:24-cr-02347), Arizona District Court (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Terrell Hackett

Last Updated:

Views: 6402

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (52 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Terrell Hackett

Birthday: 1992-03-17

Address: Suite 453 459 Gibson Squares, East Adriane, AK 71925-5692

Phone: +21811810803470

Job: Chief Representative

Hobby: Board games, Rock climbing, Ghost hunting, Origami, Kabaddi, Mushroom hunting, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Terrell Hackett, I am a gleaming, brainy, courageous, helpful, healthy, cooperative, graceful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.